Unsworth Properties Limited
Corner of Northcote and Hurstmere Strand Arcade Stout and Balance St Carpark 289 Great South road
Property Due Diligence
Tenant Representation
Property Investment Mgmt
Development
Recent Projects
Director
Contact UPL
Home
New Zealand Herald Article 2003

    A Vendor’s disposal strategy

    What to consider when selling an investment property

    Grant Unsworth of UPL (Unsworth Properties Ltd) says when selling a property or a portfolio of properties, careful consideration should be given to setting an appropriate strategy for divestment. Relying solely on an agent to obtain best price on a disposal is not always the best option. Using the right agent/s and methods and ensuring that sale and purchase agreements are watertight often provide the most effective outcome for a client. UPL has sold down over $23m with valuations of $20.8m during the last 12 months for the Dairy Industry Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, previously the Dairy Board Superannuation Scheme.

    The Dairy Industry Superannuation Scheme portfolio provided a diverse and challenging selection of properties including two office buildings in Wellington and four properties in Auckland two of which were sold with vacant possession.

    Method of Sale

    A number of different sales methods were adopted during the sell down taking into account the target market, expected level of competition, monetary size and complexity of the building.

    Sale by Auction

    This is designed to set definite time frames and to create ‘on the spot’ competition between interested parties. This method is very successful for lower priced investments that attract a wide audience and generally works well in a strong market.

    Sale by Tender(formal)

    Parties submit offers on a nominated date under terms set down in the tender documents. This method can often be intimidating for purchasers as there will usually be higher up front legal costs related to the tender documentation with no guarantee of success for the purchaser. This method is more suited for large value transactions like shopping centres and large office buildings that are more complex and have a number of tenancies.

    Sale by Private Treaty

    The owner nominates a price (not in all cases) and conditions, which are acceptable, and negotiates with interested parties. This method is less onerous than a formal tender and allows the purchaser to deal with any party.

    Sale by Tender(informal)

    Prospective purchasers make offers on terms and conditions to suit them by a certain date and the vendor treats first with the best offer. This method is now widely used as it allows the purchasers to submit their own contracts with the comfort of knowing they will be treated first if their terms are most favourable.

    Agency Appointment

    When selecting an agent it is important to ensure that you are happy with the method of sale and the type of agency that you adopt. Agency fees are generally negotiable with the agency concerned and will vary according to the monetary size of the property and the complexity. Fees normally range between 1-2% (of the sale price).

    Agency appointments can include; either using a single agency (sole agency) or combined (joint) or allowing any agent to submit offers through a general agency. An interesting variation to these methods adopted by the Dairy Industry Superannuation Scheme was the master agency.  This involved the appointment of a master agent to co ordinate offers through other agents with a separate fee being paid to the master agent and a set fee being paid to the successful introducing agent. This method worked particularly well in the sale of a Wellington property where there was strong investment demand in the market and utilised a number of the local agents to create a buying frenzy for investors to put their best foot forward. An informal tender process was adopted and the campaign that lasted 6 weeks drew 8 tenders including an unconditional contract. This method whilst not always popular with agencies keeps everyone focused and is suitable for markets where there is strong investment demand. The disadvantage of this method is that it involves a greater degree of input from the vendor but this is usually outweighed by a higher sale price. In this case the property in question sold $1m in excess of its valuation.

    Preparation of Property for sale

    Preparation of a property for sale is vital and it is important that the vendor is aware of all aspects concerning the title, tenancies and building.

    An audit should be undertaken which looks specifically at the leases for the property to ensure that there are no outstanding documentation issues in respect to rent reviews, lease renewals or any unusual arrangements in the leases.

    Car park plans and ownership of chattels, fixtures and fittings together with their depreciation arrangements should be clear.

    It is important to review Council records to ensure that there are no outstanding requisitions against the property which could come up during a due diligence period.

    The vendor should also have a good understanding of the following building issues:

    a)     Building structure and condition

    b)    Building Act compliance

    c)     Outstanding/deferred maintenance

    d)     Environmental and other issues

    e)     Assessment of plant and machinery

    f)     Existence of as built plans for the building

    Tenancy schedules and OPEX (operating expense budgets) need to be scrutinised carefully to ensure that the net operating income is accurate, as this will ultimately determine price and value. During a sell down, regular advice from valuers ensured that UPL was well advised on valuation issues during negotiations with the purchasers.

    Sale and purchase agreements

    In respect to the sale and purchase agreements there are a number of areas that need to be looked at closely. This is a very wide area which is not able to covered in detail in this article and vendor’s would be advised to seek advice from their solicitor  in respect to any sale and purchase contracts offered.

    One of the more interesting special clauses, in a sale and purchase contract is the use of a cash out clause that is particularly useful when dealing with purchasers who require long due diligence periods on conditional contracts.

    This clause allows the vendor to treat with other offers during the due diligence period and if the offer is acceptable to the vendor, they can initiate the clause by giving notice to the purchaser who will have a defined period to confirm that they are going to go unconditional or not.

    One of the Scheme’s buildings in central Auckland, which was being sold with vacant possession, had the ability to be converted to residential accommodation and had a higher end value than it’s existing use as office space. As there were a number of developers who were interested in the site and required long due diligence periods, UPL used this clause to keep a number of these parties in the frame and eventually achieved a higher price and an unconditional contract for the scheme.

    In conclusion, vendors should be careful when divesting their property, as it can be an involved process that requires skill and experience to ensure that risks are managed. For vendors who are currently holding investment property now is an opportune time to sell with the strong investment market working in their favour. On the flip side, purchasers should also seek advice and undertake detailed due diligence before they commit to their future financial obligation. Buyers should be wary of the strong market conditions and ensure that their investment provides the required returns they are seeking.

    Prior to setting up his own company, Unsworth was the Property Investment Manager for Guardian Trust. Since returning to NZ from the UK, he has sold over $65m of property with valuations of $60.8m Before returning to NZ, Unsworth worked in London for Schroder Properties Ltd as a property analyst and asset manager. During the late eighties, he worked in Wellington for AMP Investments where he was responsible for a $120 million property portfolio. His company UPL provides independent property investment advice to clients in respect to buying and selling and tenant representation.