An audit should be
undertaken which looks specifically at the leases for the property to ensure
that there are no outstanding documentation issues in respect to rent reviews,
lease renewals or any unusual arrangements in the leases.
Car park plans and
ownership of chattels, fixtures and fittings together with their depreciation
arrangements should be clear.
It is important to
review Council records to ensure that there are no outstanding requisitions
against the property which could come up during a due diligence period.
The vendor should
also have a good understanding of the following building issues:
a) Building structure and condition
b) Building Act compliance
c) Outstanding/deferred maintenance
d) Environmental and other issues
e) Assessment of plant and machinery
f) Existence of as built plans for the
building
Tenancy schedules
and OPEX (operating expense budgets) need to be scrutinised carefully to ensure
that the net operating income is accurate, as this will ultimately determine
price and value. During a sell down, regular advice from valuers ensured that
UPL was well advised on valuation issues during negotiations with the
purchasers.
Sale and purchase agreements
In respect to the
sale and purchase agreements there are a number of areas that need to be looked
at closely. This is a very wide area which is not able to covered in detail in
this article and vendor’s would be advised to seek advice from their
solicitor in respect to any sale and
purchase contracts offered.
One of the more
interesting special clauses, in a sale and purchase contract is the use of a
cash out clause that is particularly useful when dealing with purchasers who
require long due diligence periods on conditional contracts.
This clause allows
the vendor to treat with other offers during the due diligence period and if
the offer is acceptable to the vendor, they can initiate the clause by giving notice
to the purchaser who will have a defined period to confirm that they are going
to go unconditional or not.
One of the
Scheme’s buildings in central Auckland, which was being sold with vacant
possession, had the ability to be converted to residential accommodation and
had a higher end value than it’s existing use as office space. As there were a
number of developers who were interested in the site and required long due
diligence periods, UPL used this clause to keep a number of these parties in
the frame and eventually achieved a higher price and an unconditional contract
for the scheme.
In conclusion,
vendors should be careful when divesting their property, as it can be an
involved process that requires skill and experience to ensure that risks are managed.
For vendors who are currently holding investment property now is an opportune
time to sell with the strong investment market working in their favour. On the
flip side, purchasers should also seek advice and undertake detailed due
diligence before they commit to their future financial obligation. Buyers
should be wary of the strong market conditions and ensure that their investment
provides the required returns they are seeking.
Prior to setting
up his own company, Unsworth was the Property Investment Manager for Guardian
Trust. Since returning to NZ from the UK, he has sold over $65m of property
with valuations of $60.8m Before returning to NZ, Unsworth worked in London for
Schroder Properties Ltd as a property analyst and asset manager. During the
late eighties, he worked in Wellington for AMP Investments where he was
responsible for a $120 million property portfolio. His company UPL provides
independent property investment advice to clients in respect to buying and
selling and tenant representation.